My discipleship group today explored the topic on
suffering. We used as materials the book by Philip Yancey titled ‘Where is God
when it hurts’. We talked about the various scenarios of sufferings that exist
in the world, from relatively small ones like a relationship breakup, to large
ones like suffering from cancer. One of the questions from the material was whether
one’s witness of suffering, be it personal or that of friends’ or relatives’,
has made one conscious of a different set of values in life. One thing that our
discipleship group agreed upon is the success-oriented and materialistic
mindsets in Singapore’s culture. And sometimes, suffering puts all these things
into perspective, that life and health is more important than success. I
brought up the account of the late Dr
Richard Teo who died of cancer when he was only 40 years old. His story was
featured in the newspaper. He was a successful ophthalmologist, owning his
private practice, a millionaire. He was in the prime of his life, and had just
made a deal to buy a piece of land where he wanted to build his bungalow, when
he was diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer. Before dying, he gave a speech about
his thoughts on life, wealth, and success, and his reflections. I was thinking
how dreadful it must have felt for him to be diagnosed with a terminal illness
from out of the blue, with no apparent rhyme or reason. He was thinking about
affairs in life, such as buying a house with the wealth he had accumulated, and
had no inkling of thought in his mind that he should find himself struck by
incurable cancer.
A member brought up the point about how he felt some form
of suffering cannot find any suitable form of justification for. He talked
about the example of the woman Fantine in Les Miserables who had to resort to prostitution
in order to provide for her child, an act which many would consider immoral. He
asked, how can God allow a person who had every intention to walk in an upright
manner in life to have to resort to immorality in order to sustain herself? He
says this doesn’t sit well with the promise in the bible to “seek ye first the
kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto
you.”(Matthew
6:33)
I have read that in the world of philosophy, the
philosopher Alvin Platinga has convincingly explained away the logical problem
of the problem of evil in what is called the free will
defence. That is, the existence of evil is not logically incompatible with
the existence of God. But the evidential problem of evil remains, given with
the characterization of a good and loving God in Christian theodicy. And verses
such as that above espousing the concept of divine providence and protection
comes into question in the face of the existence of evil.
One description of an instance of suffering in the book
was the experience of the holocaust for the Jews. There was this account by a
man named Elie Wiesel who described his experience in his book titled ‘Night’.
He was witnessing the German soldiers carrying out an execution, one of the
victims being a young boy whom he described as having the face ‘of a sad little
angel’. He heard someone behind him asked twice ‘Where is God now?’ And he
heard a voice within him answer him, “Where is He? Here He is – He is hanging
here on this gallows…”
Philip Yancey writes, “Wiesel lost his faith in God at
that concentration camp. For him, God literally hung to death on the gallows,
never to be resurrected. But in fact the image that Wiesel evokes so powerfully
contains within it the answer to his question: Where was God? The voice within
Elie Wiesel spoke truth: in a way, God did hang beside the young boy. God did
not exempt even himself from human suffering. He too hung on a gallows, at
Calvary, and that alone is what keeps me believing in a God of love.”
As a conclusion to the study, I referred to Philip Yancey’s
words at page 172 – 174. “What can we do to help those who hurt? And who can
help us when we suffer? I begin with some discouraging good news. The
discouraging aspect is that I cannot give you a magic formula. There is nothing
much you can say to help suffering people. Some of the brightest minds in
history have explored every angle of the problem of pain, asking why people
hurt, yet still we find ourselves stammering out the same questions,
unrelieved. As I’ve mentioned, not even God attempted an explanation of cause
or a rationale for suffering in his reply to Job. The great king David, the
righteous man Job, and finally even the Son of God reacted to pain much the
same way as we do. They recoiled from it, thought it horrible, did their best
to alleviate it, and finally cried out to God in despair because of it.
Personally, I find it discouraging that we can come up with no final,
satisfying answer for people in pain.
And yet viewed in another way that nonanswer is
surprisingly good news. When I have asked suffering people, “Who helped you?”
not one person has mentioned a Ph,D from Yale Divinity School or a famous
philosopher. The kingdom of suffering is a democracy, and we all stand in it or
alongside it with nothing but our naked humanity. All of us have the same
capacity to help, and that is good news.
No one can package or bottle “the appropriate response to
suffering.” And words intended for everyone will almost always prove worthless
for one individual person. If you go to the sufferers themselves and ask for
helpful words, you may find discord. Some recall a friend who cheerily helped
distract them from the illness, while others think such an approach insulting.
Some want honest, straightforward confrontation; others find such discussion
unbearably depressing.
In short, there is no magic cure for a person in pain.
Mainly, such a person needs love, for love instinctively detects what is
needed. Jean Vanier, founder of l’Arche movement, says it well: “Wounded people
who have been broken by suffering and sickness ask for only one thing: a heart
that loves and commits itself to them, a heart full of hope for them.”
In fact the answer to the question, “How do I help those
who hurt?” is exactly the same as the answer to the question, “How do I love?”
If you asked me for a Bible passage to teach you how to help suffering people,
I would point to 1 Corinthians 13 and its eloquent depiction of love. That is
what a suffering person needs: love, and not knowledge and wisdom. As is so
often his pattern, God uses very ordinary people to bring about healing.
Nevertheless, love itself breaks down into specific and
practical acts. We meet suffering people in every school, in every church, in
every public building, as well as in every hospital. All of us will one day
join them. As I’ve listened to what they have to say, I have come up with four “frontiers”
where every suffering person will do battle: the frontiers of fear,
helplessness, meaning, and hope. Our response to suffering depends largely on
the outcome of our struggle in those frontiers.”
No comments:
Post a Comment