I suppose there is some fallacy in the
way I attribute my sense of awareness from my consciousness as that
representing all other human beings, and identify other human being based on
the experience from my own consciousness. But this consciousness that I have is
dependent on the physiological construct that compose my being, one of them
being intelligence which is based on the structure of my brain. And I think
that my experience from my consciousness is the representation of that which is
experienced by all other human beings such as I. Thus, when I see behavior of
the kind that is different from mine, I think of such behavior as unnatural,
because I am puzzled as to how such a being with a consciousness such as mine
would have behaved in such a manner.
But is there any reason to make an
evaluation of other human beings based on my own personhood? Intuitively to me,
I know that I am constraint in making such an attribution of the nature of my
conscious experience to other human beings around me. It seems obvious from my
observation of fellow human beings around me who act in a way that would not
naturally engender based on the nature of my personhood that they must be
possessing a different sort of physical constitution that causes them to act in
such a manner. They are behaviors which are natural to the respective
individuals because of the way they are made or ‘wired’ to be. I can only speculate
what it is like if I assume the identity of other people. How would I think or
feel if I were someone else? Is this state of consciousness that I feel really
representative of the nature of being human?
Well, it would be really interesting if
I could assume the beinghood of other people and conduct a comparative study of
the experience of consciousness of various individuals. Given the nature of my
personhood, whereby I have a social deficit disorder known as Asperger’s
Syndrome, I don’t think I would make such a good reference point from which to
evaluate or speculate on the nature of the experience of consciousness of other
individuals. But if I may guess, the ordinary person without Asperger’s Syndrome
(or to use the psychology terminology, the “Neurotypicals”) is less
introspective in nature. They are not stucked in a “in the mind” sort of
feeling that I experience. They feel much more responsive to the external stimulus
around them in the world. This helps them to connect to one another better.
Now, another trait that affects the
consciousness which would make for interesting comparison is intelligence.
Intelligence is an attribute that is melded into one’s consciousness. If I were
not intelligent enough to be employed to the task at hand, things around me would seem confusing. I would not be able
to comprehend what is being taught. I would find it difficult to work out the
solution to a problem. And if I were intelligent, the subject matter to which
my mind is applied to would seem apparent/obvious to my state of consciousness,
such that one thinks that the subject is of such fundamentality in nature as
how parallel lines are said to never meet, or that one plus one gives two. The
person who is comprehending might not be able to give an explanation to why the
comprehension for him is of such intuitiveness in nature. All he can identify
with is this ‘sensation’ of comprehension, of knowing how to go about doing
things.
No comments:
Post a Comment