I went to church today, and I went to
church last week as well. But I went to a different church that I usually go to
from the one I went today as I had to pass something to a friend there. The
church which I had went to last week was a Bible-Presbyterian (BP) church. I
have been to that church a few times now, and my impression of it is that there
is quite some difference in the stuff that they bring up there from the church
that I usually go to. For example, in a previous service which I had gone to in
the BP church, the Pastor gave a sermon about how the congregants there should
bring the church to the world at large. He had a catchy jingo to capture the
essence of his sermon. “Bring them in, see the change, send them out.” The
church was a place for people to be reformed, and then to bring that change to
the world outside the church. I don’t hear as much about bringing change from
within my church to the outside world as much in the usual Lutheran church
which I have been attending since young. It would seem to me that my church is
more focused on the redemption part of the gospel than encouraging people to
bring their reformed self beyond the church so that they can change the world positively
in their likeness as well. There is a good I suppose to not being too assertive
about the need for congregants to go out and make disciples of all nations and
messages of such nature. Sometimes, what a church goer needs to hear is how the
church or God is administering to his or her need, and not about how he or she
should fulfill his or her obligation to God to minister to the world or society
or large. Given my own stage in life right now where I find myself struggling
with my religious faith and belief in God, I find myself being more drawn
towards my own church than towards the BP church where the emphasis seems to be
about how we as Christians can bring positive change to the world.
I shall write about what went on in service
at the BP church last week, and then on what went on in my church today. At the
BP church last week, the preacher there was giving a sermon on the passage of
Daniel 2 where the biblical character Daniel had to give an interpretation to
the dream of King Nebuchadnezzar. The message of the sermon was about how
Daniel, in contrast to the other wise men in King Nebuchadnezzar’s court,
recognize that his wisdom came from God, while those other wise men relied upon
their own wisdom. The preacher made the point that true wisdom is not about
knowledge or intelligence, but about a relationship with Jesus Christ. I have a
question about the point made by the Pastor though. “Is that really what wisdom
means in the bible?” I mean, a relationship with Christ is nice and good and
all, but is that what the bible means by having wisdom? From my own reading of
the bible, it seems that wisdom has a certain quality and merit of its own
altogether apart from simply a relationship with God. Like there are certain
characters who are called wise, and this wisdom seems to entail something along
the lines of them having certainly qualities of mind or capabilities apart from
their moral rectitude or devotion to God. Why, even a character like Ahitophel
who went against King David by siding with Absalom in his uprising was esteemed
for his great wisdom. On the other hand, there may have been other exemplary
biblical characters like Moses or David, but they were not as much esteemed for
wisdom. In terms of relationship with God, David is called “A Man after God’s
own heart”, but this is not the case for wisest man who ever lived, Solomon who
is described in 1 King 11 as having turned away from God. I would prefer to
keep the term wisdom and the notion of relationship with God as separate
categories.
The thing is, is that I don’t think that it
is God’s will to grant high amount of wisdom to everyone. Sometimes, I feel
that Christians make the mistake of thinking that wisdom or intelligence is a
sign of a person’s close relationship with God, or vice versa, that a close
relationship with God would grant one wisdom or intelligence. I myself am
probably guilty of such thinking. Fact of the matter is, there are Christians
who are smart, and there are Christians who are not so smart; And there are
non-believers who are smart, and non-believers who are not so smart as well.
Whether a person is smart or wise does not necessarily mean that he or she have
a greater standing with God than someone who is less smart or wise. Someone
might have a more prominent standing in church ministry, but he or she is still
very much human nonetheless, and liable to err.
For service at my usual Lutheran church
today, the sermon passage was on Matthew 4:12-23, where Jesus first began his
public ministry. The Pastor’s message was about how Jesus ministered to a
darkened world, and how we continue to live in a darkened world where many
people in Singapore society are still non-believers and idol worshippers. The
Pastor shares about how, for exercise, he would run up the stairs of a flat,
across the corridor to the stairs on the opposite end, and repeat that until he
gets to the top. As he goes about his exercise, he would observe the outside of
the apartments he passes by, and notice that many households in Singapore
display various paraphernalia indicating their adherence to various folk
religions. According to the Pastor, these are still signs that we are trapped
in the darkness of an unbelieving world.
What do I think of this characterization of
unbelief as that of a dark world? Well, it’s pretty much conventional Christian
paradigm of framing things. It’s kind of like a lingo actually which may or may
not have as much negative connotation as one would intuitively associate with
such a term "darkness". For myself, I am not so keen on characterizing mere unbelief as
darkness. It is kind of hyperbolic in my opinion. But I do recognize that there
are quite some disturbing or concerning social phenomena that take place in
society or in the world, part of which may stem from lack of religious belief,
whether Christian or others, and of which Christianity and other religions can
serve as a guiding light.
